In the U.S., female candidates are no more likely to quit politics after suffering an electoral loss than their male counterparts.

There is weak evidence suggesting that young women in communities with a female quota changed their gender biases surrounding women's participation in politics.

Women and racial and ethnic minorities are found to benefit from mentioning their demographic identity in help requests.

Academic achievement (grade point average, or GPA) has relatively no impact on the likelihood of men being hired in entry-level jobs whereas women are most hirable if their resumes portray moderate academic achievement. Moderate academic achievement is associated with increased likeability among women candidates. 

In Uganda, couples workshops increased subsequent household participation of these couples in women's empowerment interventions.

Piped water interventions resulted in a significant reduction of time spent fetching water for girls and women, as well as increased household water consumption.

Beyond merely exposing girls to role models, actively encouraging girls to choose a role model may improve their sense of fit in science.

Quotas that force political parties to increase the number of female candidates have a neutral or beneficial effect on the parties' electability.

Cash transfers affect women and men's livelihoods differently when it comes to the reasons for why they choose to migrate.

Women with higher achievements tend to have lower performance evaluations when assessed by male evaluators who are more likely to align their beliefs with group-based hierarchies in society.