Skip to main content
Gender Action Portal

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Main navigation

  • ABOUT GAP
    • Team
    • Land Acknowledgment
    • Intersectionality Statement
    • How to use GAP
  • RESOURCES
    • Intersectional Research Summaries
    • COVID-19 Summaries
    • Additional Resources
    • WAPPP Affiliated Faculty's Research
  • CONNECT
    • Recommend a Study
    • Newsletter
    • Work for GAP
View Results 11 - 15 of 15 for:
Multivariate Regression
Image
Decision Making Icon

Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?

Judges with daughters vote more often in a feminist direction on gender related cases.

Adam Glynn, Maya Sen (2014)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Academic Achievement Icon
Image
Competition Icon

Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess

In a competitive test-taking environment (like the SAT) with penalties for wrong answers, women are less willing to guess, resulting in a loss of potential points and lower scores compared with male test-takers.

Katherine Baldiga Coffman (2014)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Talent Management Icon
Image
Business Case Icon

Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals.

Workgroup sex and race composition affects turnover and career mobility.

Kathleen McGinn, Katherine L. Milkman (2013)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Talent Management Icon
Image
Business Case Icon
Image
Bias Icon

When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation

Decrease gender bias in hiring and promotion decisions by evaluating candidates in groups, rather than one by one.

Iris Bohnet, Alexandra van Geen, Max H. Bazerman (2015)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Quotas Icon
Image
Business Case Icon

The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation

Quotas for corporate boards are effective in increasing gender diversity, but in Norway imposed costs on firms and shareholders.

Kenneth Ahern, Amy K Dittmar (2012)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Decision Making Icon

Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?

Judges with daughters vote more often in a feminist direction on gender related cases.

Adam Glynn, Maya Sen (2014)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Talent Management Icon
Image
Business Case Icon

Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals.

Workgroup sex and race composition affects turnover and career mobility.

Kathleen McGinn, Katherine L. Milkman (2013)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Quotas Icon
Image
Business Case Icon

The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation

Quotas for corporate boards are effective in increasing gender diversity, but in Norway imposed costs on firms and shareholders.

Kenneth Ahern, Amy K Dittmar (2012)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Academic Achievement Icon
Image
Competition Icon

Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess

In a competitive test-taking environment (like the SAT) with penalties for wrong answers, women are less willing to guess, resulting in a loss of potential points and lower scores compared with male test-takers.

Katherine Baldiga Coffman (2014)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Talent Management Icon
Image
Business Case Icon
Image
Bias Icon

When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation

Decrease gender bias in hiring and promotion decisions by evaluating candidates in groups, rather than one by one.

Iris Bohnet, Alexandra van Geen, Max H. Bazerman (2015)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More

Pagination

  • First page first
  • Previous page previous
  • 1
  • 2

Newsletter Signup

Connect with us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Home

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Footer Menu

  • WAPPP
  • HKS
  • HarvardU
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
  • Privacy Statement

©   The President and Fellows of Harvard College