Intended versus unintended consequences of migration restriction policies: evidence from a natural experiment in Indonesia

Restrictive migration policy , which restricted people from emigrating (migrating away) from their country of origin, deteriorated the local labor market by pushing a higher percentage of women than men into informal and agricultural work but also led to an increase in junior secondary school enrollment.

Introduction


Research about restrictive migration policy that limits people’s international movement has mainly focused on restrictions to immigration at the destination (that is, limits imposed by the place where the person is immigrating to). Few studies have focused on the effect of migration policy at the place of origin (that is, limits imposed by the place where the person is emigrating from).  Furthermore, most studies have focused on male, rather than female migrants.

In this study, researchers investigate the impacts of migration restrictions placed at the place of origin, which primarily affected female domestic workers, through a case study on Indonesia. In Indonesia, migration is a predominantly female phenomenon spurred by the increasing demand for domestic workers in the Middle East and neighboring countries. In 2006, female migrants accounted for 80% of total documented migrants, and female migrants to Saudi Arabia and Malaysia, the two top destinations of Indonesian migrant workers, represented 55% of total (documented) flows, and 70% of total female migrants.

In June 2011, in response to increasingly frequent cases of abuses and exploitation suffered by Indonesian domestic workers, the Indonesian government instituted a migration restriction (moratorium) for female domestic workers traveling to Saudi Arabia. Following the announcement, the Saudi government in turn announced the suspension of work Permits to Indonesian domestic workers.

This moratorium created a large-scale natural experiment where Indonesian districts that were places of origin for migrants to Saudi Arabia were compared to all other Indonesian districts before and after the policy. Using local census and national survey data, this study specifically measured the impact of the migration restrictions on the local labor market, consumption patterns of Indonesian households, and school enrollment in places of origin.

Related GAP Studies