The Effect of Gender-Targeted Transfers: Experimental Evidence From India

Evidence from India suggests gender-targeted cash transfer programs can empower women in household decision-making processes but have little effect on household expenditures, savings, income, or nutrition.
 

Introduction

Around the world, many cash transfer and welfare programs target women as recipients. Initiatives range from universal child support programs in higher-income countries to conditional cash transfer programs in lower-income countries.

Two core arguments are often used to justify gender-targeted cash transfers. First, there is the argument that targeting women leads to consumption behaviors that are beneficial for children. The second argument is that targeting women contributes to gender equality by empowering female recipients. Despite the prevalence of cash transfer programs targeting women as recipients, there exists little empirical evidence that gender-targeted transfers advance child welfare or gender equality.

In this study, the authors evaluated the impact of gender-targeted cash transfers on the finances of rural households in Chhattisgarh, a Central-Eastern State of India. To do so, they randomly allocated weekly unconditional transfers to a man or a woman within a household and studied the effects across five variables: household expenditures, income, saving, nutrition, and decision-making processes.

Related GAP Studies