Skip to main content
Gender Action Portal

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Main navigation

  • ABOUT GAP
    • Team
    • Land Acknowledgment
    • Intersectionality Statement
    • How to use GAP
  • RESOURCES
    • Intersectional Research Summaries
    • COVID-19 Summaries
    • Additional Resources
    • WAPPP Affiliated Faculty's Research
  • CONNECT
    • Recommend a Study
    • Newsletter
    • Work for GAP
View Results 1 - 3 of 3 for:
Jessica M. Salerno
Image
Bias Icon

Closing with Emotion: The Differential Impact of Male Versus Female Attorneys Expressing Anger in Court

Male attorneys expressing anger are more likely to be viewed positively (as influential, commanding, and effective), whereas female attorneys expressing anger are more likely to be viewed negatively (as shrill, overly emotional, and ineffective).

Jessica M. Salerno, Hannah J. Phalen, Rosa N. Reyes, N. J. Schweitzer (2018)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Decision Making Icon
Image
Bias Icon
Image
Negotiation Icon

Women and African Americans are less influential when they express anger during group decision-making

During negotiations, expressing anger decreases influence for women and African Americans but does not decrease the influence of white men.

Jessica M. Salerno, Liana C. Peter-Hagene, Alexander C. V. Jay (2019)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Bias Icon
Image
Decision Making Icon

One Angry Woman: Anger Expression Increases Influence for Men, but Decreases Influence for Women, During Group Deliberation

During group deliberations, the act of expressing anger increases a man’s influence but decreases a woman’s influence.

Jessica M. Salerno, Liana C. Peter-Hagene (2015)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Bias Icon

Closing with Emotion: The Differential Impact of Male Versus Female Attorneys Expressing Anger in Court

Male attorneys expressing anger are more likely to be viewed positively (as influential, commanding, and effective), whereas female attorneys expressing anger are more likely to be viewed negatively (as shrill, overly emotional, and ineffective).

Jessica M. Salerno, Hannah J. Phalen, Rosa N. Reyes, N. J. Schweitzer (2018)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Bias Icon
Image
Decision Making Icon

One Angry Woman: Anger Expression Increases Influence for Men, but Decreases Influence for Women, During Group Deliberation

During group deliberations, the act of expressing anger increases a man’s influence but decreases a woman’s influence.

Jessica M. Salerno, Liana C. Peter-Hagene (2015)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More
Image
Decision Making Icon
Image
Bias Icon
Image
Negotiation Icon

Women and African Americans are less influential when they express anger during group decision-making

During negotiations, expressing anger decreases influence for women and African Americans but does not decrease the influence of white men.

Jessica M. Salerno, Liana C. Peter-Hagene, Alexander C. V. Jay (2019)
Sharing
Share
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin Share by Email
Read More

Newsletter Signup

Connect with us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Home

A RESOURCE CREATED BY:

Footer Menu

  • WAPPP
  • HKS
  • HarvardU
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
  • Privacy Statement

©   The President and Fellows of Harvard College